Flick the Fluoride
Sunraysia's Anti Fluoridation Network
Sunraysia's Anti Fluoridation Network
We are a group of concerned citizens fighting against an anti democratic campaign by the Victorian Government & Mildura Rural City Council to introduce the S7 poison Hydrofluorosilicic Acid (Fluoride) to our vital drinking water supply.
94% of surveyed resident's say NO!
Why are they going ahead with expensive and dangerous Fluoridation when the people clearly don't want it?
Last time I checked I thought we lived in a democracy?
The following is a list of articles and commentary intended to educate people to the truths of Fluoride - Make up your own mind!
We are a group of concerned citizens fighting against an anti democratic campaign by the Victorian Government & Mildura Rural City Council to introduce the S7 poison Hydrofluorosilicic Acid (Fluoride) to our vital drinking water supply.
94% of surveyed resident's say NO!
Why are they going ahead with expensive and dangerous Fluoridation when the people clearly don't want it?
Last time I checked I thought we lived in a democracy?
The following is a list of articles and commentary intended to educate people to the truths of Fluoride - Make up your own mind!
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Scoop! New Film features Mildura! FIRE WATER: Australia's Industrial Fluoridation Disgrace (Part 1 of 9)
http://www.firewaterfilm.com/watchfilm.htm
Paul Connett Visiting Mildura
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Sunraysia Daily - Anti-fluoride expert here: Professor Connett to put case against additive in our water
BY KIERAN ILES
05 Feb, 2011 04:00 AM
FLUORIDE will be thrust back into the spotlight this month with a visit from environmental activitist Professor Paul Connett.
Prof Connett, executive director of the world-wide Fluroide Action Network, will speak at two meetings at the Setts in Mildura on February 20.
He will meet local health professionals, including doctors and dentists, at 10am, before addressing an open meeting at 7.30pm.
Prof Connett is in Europe promoting his book The Case Against Fluoride as part of a world tour, but is keen to promote the anti-fluoride message in Australia.
It is a far cry from his early days as an academic, when he was staunchly pro-fluoride.
Anti-Fluoridation Association of Mildura spokesperson Rosemarie Zalec said the association was pleased to have Prof Connet as a speaker.
“Prof Connett is willing to debate anyone on the safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation,” she said.
“He would like to see evidence that fluoride is safe and effective.
“To date he has not been able to find any research studies to prove this.
“Many challenges to debate him have been refused by Victorian Health Department officials.”
His visit comes about six months after fluoride was added to water supplies in Sunraysia.
Ms Zalec said the community had strongly voiced its opposition to fluoride, with more than 10,000 people signing a local petition.
“By coming along to listen to Professor Connett, Sunraysia residents will have the opportunity to hear the most up to date research on fluoride,” she said.
“Australia continues to be the most fluoridated country in the world.
“Whereas many countries are taking fluoride out of the water in response to the latest research, Australia continues to force fluoridation on all communities.”
The association will extend invitations to Mildura Rural city councillors and local MPs John Forrest and Peter Crisp.
A meeting headlined by high-profile dentist and anti-fluoride campaigner Dr Andrew Harms in November 2008 attracted more than 500 people.
This story appeared in Saturday’s Sunraysia Daily 05/02/2011.
http://www.sunraysiadaily.com.au/news/local/news/general/antifluoride-expert-here-professor-connett-to-put-case-against-additive-in-our-water/2067391.aspx
Monday, January 17, 2011
Bombshell: Government Admits Fluoride Hurting Children
Aaron Dykes & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, January 15, 2011
A significant milestone in the fight against fluoride emerged quietly and without major notice from the mainstream news last week. After decades of ignoring the research about the dangers and hailing water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest health achievements of the 20th Century (CDC), the government is calling for a reduction in the amount of fluoride it adds to public water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). For the first time since 1962, the standard for fluoride will be lowered from 1.2 to 0.7 milligrams per liter.
Because fluoride from water builds up over time in the human body, this reduction will not eliminate the dangers of fluoride– which include risk of bone cancer, bone fractures, thyroid disorder, brain inflammation, lowered IQ and mental functions, sterility or reduced fertility and more. However, it is a good sign that the powers-that-be are losing ground on the fluoride debate. Further, the reduction of fluoridation is proof that the warnings from activists, critics and health professionals have been heard after all.
As Alex Jones points out in the video, many of those health professionals who have been blowing the whistle on fluoridation for decades are employees or union contractors of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other governmental regulation agencies. Their objections, based on alarming scientific studies such as the one linking fluoridation with a seven-fold increase in bone cancer for boys, have heretofore been almost wholly ignored, until now. One reason for this government admission, by the way, likely has to do with limiting liability for those harmful effects, or even establishing immunity for districts who adhere to lowering the fluoride standard against future claims to harm.
At the same time, hundreds of other chemicals including many toxic ingredients like lead, arsenic, radium and uranium are also found in public drinking water. Many of these dangerous toxins are put into the water as part of the fluoride-cocktail administered in the many municipalities across the United States and other Western countries, or are leached into the supply via the acidic levels of fluoride. The compound is often not simply sodium fluoride, but a mix of toxic waste byproduct [see chart for hydrofluosilicic acid] created in the process of scrubbing phosphate fertilizer plants and in other high industry applications, such as aluminum.
Furthermore, while fluoride is scheduled for reduction in public water supplies, it is still very common and often dangerously concentrated in many food products at levels of many more parts per million than water and in pesticides used for food production, and in the soils where those pesticides are used.
Though these other fluoride dangers are significant enough that we need to continue educating and informing our fellow friends, neighbors and families, those who have long spoken out about this issue can cherish one victory on the road to taking back our nation, our lives and our health. Now, with this important government admission, we must push for complete removal of added fluoride from public water in our areas.
Further, as advisors to government bodies around the world attempt to argue for forced mass-medication by adding substances like lithium to public water, we must argue against ‘forced consent’ and demand one of our most integral human rights– that no government of man can make a law to force medicate us against our will. We have a human right to say no, especially when we know better.
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, January 15, 2011
A significant milestone in the fight against fluoride emerged quietly and without major notice from the mainstream news last week. After decades of ignoring the research about the dangers and hailing water fluoridation as one of the 10 greatest health achievements of the 20th Century (CDC), the government is calling for a reduction in the amount of fluoride it adds to public water supplies, citing its negative effect on teeth (dental fluorosis). For the first time since 1962, the standard for fluoride will be lowered from 1.2 to 0.7 milligrams per liter.
Because fluoride from water builds up over time in the human body, this reduction will not eliminate the dangers of fluoride– which include risk of bone cancer, bone fractures, thyroid disorder, brain inflammation, lowered IQ and mental functions, sterility or reduced fertility and more. However, it is a good sign that the powers-that-be are losing ground on the fluoride debate. Further, the reduction of fluoridation is proof that the warnings from activists, critics and health professionals have been heard after all.
As Alex Jones points out in the video, many of those health professionals who have been blowing the whistle on fluoridation for decades are employees or union contractors of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other governmental regulation agencies. Their objections, based on alarming scientific studies such as the one linking fluoridation with a seven-fold increase in bone cancer for boys, have heretofore been almost wholly ignored, until now. One reason for this government admission, by the way, likely has to do with limiting liability for those harmful effects, or even establishing immunity for districts who adhere to lowering the fluoride standard against future claims to harm.
At the same time, hundreds of other chemicals including many toxic ingredients like lead, arsenic, radium and uranium are also found in public drinking water. Many of these dangerous toxins are put into the water as part of the fluoride-cocktail administered in the many municipalities across the United States and other Western countries, or are leached into the supply via the acidic levels of fluoride. The compound is often not simply sodium fluoride, but a mix of toxic waste byproduct [see chart for hydrofluosilicic acid] created in the process of scrubbing phosphate fertilizer plants and in other high industry applications, such as aluminum.
Furthermore, while fluoride is scheduled for reduction in public water supplies, it is still very common and often dangerously concentrated in many food products at levels of many more parts per million than water and in pesticides used for food production, and in the soils where those pesticides are used.
Though these other fluoride dangers are significant enough that we need to continue educating and informing our fellow friends, neighbors and families, those who have long spoken out about this issue can cherish one victory on the road to taking back our nation, our lives and our health. Now, with this important government admission, we must push for complete removal of added fluoride from public water in our areas.
Further, as advisors to government bodies around the world attempt to argue for forced mass-medication by adding substances like lithium to public water, we must argue against ‘forced consent’ and demand one of our most integral human rights– that no government of man can make a law to force medicate us against our will. We have a human right to say no, especially when we know better.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)