Sunraysia's Anti Fluoridation Network

Sunraysia's Anti Fluoridation Network

We are a group of concerned citizens fighting against an anti democratic campaign by the Victorian Government & Mildura Rural City Council to introduce the S7 poison Hydrofluorosilicic Acid (Fluoride) to our vital drinking water supply.

94% of surveyed resident's say NO!

Why are they going ahead with expensive and dangerous Fluoridation when the people clearly don't want it?
Last time I checked I thought we lived in a democracy?

The following is a list of articles and commentary intended to educate people to the truths of Fluoride - Make up your own mind!

Friday, July 23, 2010

Mayor admits Concern!

Fridays Sunraysia Daily Newspaper has a front page article titled "Fluoride Flip" in which it states -

Milduras community leaders have waded into the great Fluoride debate but it has come to late.
Just days before Fluoride flows into our water supply, Mayor Glenn Milne has admitted he personally does not want Fluoride in Sunraysia's drinking water.

"We shouldn't be adding anything that we don't need to our water - "Im not keen - When you understand that Fluoride is actually a poison in large quantities, theres always a concern there."

Wild stuff!
Even the Local council is beginning to come to its senses!
This is due in no small part the extensive education campaign undertaken by this group, which will continue and be stepped up until this toxic crap is removed forever from our vital water supply!

*We will not give up!
*We will not back off!
*We will be Victorious!

The article can be found here -

Here is an excerpt from the on line edition.

Sunraysia Daily News
Fluoride flip
23 Jul, 2010 04:00 AM
MILDURA’S community leaders have waded into the great fluoride debate but it has come too late.

Just days before fluoride flows into our water supply, Mayor Glenn Milne has admitted he personally does not want fluoride in Sunraysia’s drinking water.

“We shouldn’t be adding anything that we don’t need to our water,” he said.

“I’m not keen.

“When you understand that fluoride is actually a poison, in large quantities, there’s always a concern there.”

A phone survey of Mildura Rural City councillors yesterday revealed there are doubts within council about the benefits of fluoridation.

A majority believes the community should have been given a say, rather than being subjected to a State Government sanctioned “forced medication”.

But, love it or hate it, fluoride will be added into Mildura’s drinking water on Monday.

For more of this story, purchase your copy of Friday's Sunraysia Daily 23-7-2010.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Fluoride Flyers!

Some of you may be receiving some of these in your letterbox soon!


There are three types of manufactured fluoride and one natural called calcium fluoride:

Hydrofluorosolicic acid

Sodium silicofluoride

Sodium fluoride

Q. Where does a truck driver pick up his load of fluoride?

A. One source comes from the phosphate fertilizer industry.

Q. What part of the fertilizer manufacturing process does fluoride come from?

A. It is picked up in the pollution control devices of the exhaust chimneys of the factory

Q. What classification does it have?

A. It is toxic waste poison acid

Q. Where does it rate as a nutrient?

A. It has no rating as a nutrient. On the hazardous goods safety procedures sheet it states, permanent eye damage, permanent skin damage, total body acid suit fitted with a breathing apparatus must be worn (to avoid the risk of death), corrosive, and highly toxic, can be fatal if swallowed, may react with some metals to produce explosive hydrogen gas. It comes in containers clearly marked with the skull and crossbones – symbol to warn of death

Q. Is it good for your teeth?

A. It is a total body poison. There is nothing in fluoride that is good for your body. 3 ml in a medicine glass is a fatal dose.

Q. Is it safe in very low doses?

A. It can be diluted, but this just slows down the effects. It is never safe.

Q. Is it a medication?

A. Many medications are low dose poisons. A medication is something that is given to you to improve your health. There is nothing in fluoride to improve your health or your teeth. Yet the government insists on this mass medication!

Q. Does fluoride prevent tooth decay?

A. Tasmania has had fluoride the longest. Their own paper admits that they have the worst teeth in Australia. Initially fluoride hardens teeth, but over time the teeth with an over exposure of fluoride, chip and crack and affected parts fall out. Photos we have prove this happens. Dentists have also spoken about the damage that over exposure to fluoride does to teeth

Q. The government says it is safe and effective. Is it safe?

A. The dangerous goods class labels sheet states that solids or liquids that are able to cause, to varying severity, damage to living tissue, may be either acidic or caustic in nature, are a class hazard 8 in 9

Q. What would they do with fluoride poison if they were not putting it in our water?

A. The correct place for “toxic waste poison acid” is a toxic waste dump. Our group has researched and found a lot of information on fluoride. One report states fluoride is so toxic and dangerous that it cannot be simply dumped.

Q. Is the fluoride agenda about our teeth?

A. Stalin and Hitler were the first dictators known to use fluoride as a way of controlling people in their concentration camps. Fluoride kept people extremely docile and easy to manipulate. With enough fluoride in a person’s brain, they will become docile and controllable. Even on low doses, after one year, fluoride will permanently change a person’s ability to care about the truth, or anything or anyone, or to be logical.

In the Fluoridation Referendum run by the Mildura Anti- Fluoride group, 3,916 electors clearly stated their opposition to the fluoridation of Mildura’s water supply (94 out of every hundred voters opposed water fluoridation). In a democracy a referendum is the “discovered majority will of the people” By forcing fluoridation of community water supplies, the government is working against the people. You are paying them. They are your employees. When the government disobeys the people, you have dictatorship and tyranny – when the government obeys the people, you have democracy and freedom.

Q. What can people do about this forced fluoridation situation?

A. It’s your life. It’s your choice. It’s your health. Water fluoridation is a four party political agenda. This is an election year. Help us choose FREEDOM. Help us restore DEMOCRACY! Help us STOP WATER FLUORIDATION!! We need PEOPLE POWER! Every individual can help to make a difference

Check out the truth at

Contact or Phone: 50245885 or 50242124 to hear more about what you can do to help

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

European Court Ruling spells an end to water fluoridation.

Fluoridated water must be treated as a medicine, and cannot be used to prepare foods. That is the decision of the European Court of Justice, in a landmark case dealing with the classification and regulation of 'functional drinks' in member states of the European Community. (HLH Warenvertriebs and Orthica (Joined Cases C-211/03, C-299/03, C-316/03 and C-318/03) 9 June 2005)

Functional drinks are those products that have two different purposes – for example, nutrition and exerting a positive effect on some medical condition. They include 'near-water drinks with added minerals' and, in view of the properties claimed for fluoridated water by fluoride advocates, it must be classified as a 'functional food', and therefore falls within the scope of the relevant legislation.

Medicinal law takes precedent over food law.

The Court ruled that, where two different sets of rules appear to apply to a product, medicinal legislation must take precedent, and the product must be regulated as a medicine. It emphasized that medicines regulators in member states do not have the power to exercise discretion on the classification of such dual-function products. The repeated refusal of the British and Irish Regulators to recognize fluoridated water as a medicinal product is therefore an unlawful misuse of their powers, and one that requires immediate reversal.

ECJ rulings do not establish new laws, but clarify how existing ones should be applied, and are enforceable in the domestic legislation of all member states of the EC. In effect, this decision at last confirms the claim that I have made for many years – that existing medicinal law has always required that fluoridated water be regulated as a medicine. Fluoridated water has no medicinal marketing authorization ('product license'), and because of this it is – and always has been - illegal to supply it to the public, as the 1968 Medicines Act confirms.

As a 'medicinal water', the protection afforded by the water quality regulations that shield consumers from hazardous substances in drinking water does not apply. Its use in the processing of foodstuffs is also prohibited, under the food safety legislation. Aa a direct result of this ruling, all English and Irish legislation providing for water fluoridation are at last exposed as having been in violation of that fundamental prohibition, and must now be repealed.

The beginning of the end - fluoridation must now be banned, worldwide.

This ECJ ruling effectively puts the final nail in the coffin of water fluoridation, not only within the EC but worldwide. It establishes a very substantial but entirely justified obstacle to trade in food products that are prepared without proper regard to the protection of the public that is enshrined in law. The ruling must be recognized and enforced not only in every member state, but also in any external state that wishes to trade with the EC in processed foods. So just what can be done to resolve the present unacceptable situation?

One solution would be to grant a medicinal license to fluoridated water. But the Court ruled that any evaluation of a functional drink may only be done under the rigorous procedures required to scrutinise any pharmaceutical product. In the present state of scientific concern over the evidence of its lack of efficacy and safety it is impossible to imagine that such a license could ever be granted. If it were, it would immediately result in a world-wide denunciation from the scientific community that is fully aware of the improper commercial influence that is at the heart of the international promotion of fluoridated products.

The only acceptable response is to call a halt to this controversial practice now. The experience of the past half century has shown that it is completely unjustified - indeed, it is responsible for what may reasonably be described as a pandemic of avoidable chronic fluoride poisoning. In ruling that this type of product must be regulated under medicinal law, the Court has taken the final step towards bringing this disreputable practice to a long-delayed end. Let us hope that national Governments all over the world will heed this decision - the economic consequences will be dire for those who continue to attempt to continue this discredited and illegal practice.

Fluoride Deception Part 1

Fluoride Deception Part 2

Fluoride Deception Part 3

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Suppression of Civil Rights in Australia re: Fluoridation

In November 1994 the Victorian Parliament passed an amendment to the Fluoridation Act by changing the Constitution to stop the Supreme Court from hearing cases against Artificial Fluoridation. If you are poisoned by fluoride in Victoria tough luck, there is no protection under law.

The Tasmanian Government in 1995 passed a Bill through the Lower House to prohibit the holding of meetings on the subject of Fluoridation anywhere at all in Tasmania. Called the Consequential Amendments Bill it was later withdrawn but is being re-worded. Outside of Tasmania, no outcry, no boycotts, why?

A draconian law was enacted in NSW in 1989. Because of this law, a Council cannot cease Fluoridation of its own water supply, after requests by public demand, unless it gets permission from the Health Department. And there is little chance of that.

Australia is a signatory to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). This U.N. law states that 'no one shall be subjected without his consent to medical or scientific experimentation.' The Health Dept. cannot produce one double blind scientific study which proves absolutely the safety and efficacy of fluoridation. It seems we are all experimental subjects.

If fluoridation is so safe or effective, why this repressive legislation ?

Why don't we hear about it in the media?

Historical uses of Fluoride

*Comrade Stalin*

Death Toll - 66 million people Executed, Tortured, Starved, Frozen or Worked to Death in Gulags.
Job - Dictator and Murderous Megalomaniac.
Department - Soviet Russia
Fluoride race position 1st - First to introduce Fluoride into the water supply of Gulags (Concentration camps) in the 1930s.

A frozen Siberian Gulag.

*Comrade Hitler*

Death Toll - 25 million people Murdered, Tortured, Starved to death & WWII casualties.
Job - Dictator and Murderous Megalomaniac.
Department - Greater Germany.
Fluoride race position 2nd - Hitler got some great ideas from Stalin, one of which was the use of Fluoride in Concentration and prisoner of war camps.


*Comrade Carnie*

Job - Doctor and Fluoride Cheerleader
Department - Victorian Department of Human Services
Fluoride race position - Down the list a little but the lucky first to introduce Fluoride to Sunraysia

Fluoride - Some interesting facts

"The first (Ed actually 2nd) occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany's Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride's supposed effect on children's teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission."

Ref : The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben by Joseph Borkin

USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before Un-American Activity committees of Congress in the 1950's that in his post as U.S.Soviet liaison officer, the Soviets openly admitted to...

"Using the fluoride in the water supplies in their gulags (concentration camps), to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient."

Fluoride, or Hydrofluorosilic acid (H 2 SiF 6 ), is not naturally occurring but is a waste by-product derived from the industrial manufacture of aluminium, zinc, uranium, aerosols, insecticides, fertilizers, plastics, lubricants and pharmaceuticals.

It is also a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972 ranking in toxicity above lead and just below arsenic.

Fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).

American toothpastes containing fluoride are by law obliged to state, '"WARNING: Keep out of reach of children under 6 years of age. If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately."

Sodium Fluoride - The Obedience Drug!

Fluoride reduces Human IQ - Studies

Can you guess which of these lovely Australian girls are from towns with Fluoridated water supplies?

23 published studies report an association of reduced IQ
with high fluoride exposure

Studies listed here.

Human Cognitive Abilities.
In assessing the potential health effects of fluoride at 2-4 mg/L, the committee found three studies of human populations exposed at those concentrations in drinking water that were useful for informing its assessment of potential neurologic effects. These studies were conducted in different areas of China, where fluoride concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 4 mg/L. Comparisons were made between the IQs of children from those populations with children exposed to lower concentration of fluoride ranging from 0.4 to 1 mg/L. The studies reported that while modal IQ scores were unchanged, the average IQ scores were lower in the more highly exposed children. This was due to fewer children in the high IQ range. While the studies lacked sufficient detail for the committee to fully assess their quality and their relevance to U.S. populations, the consistency of the collective results warrant additional research on the effects of fluoride on intelligence. Investigation of other mental and physiological alterations reported in the case study literature, including mental confusion and lethargy, should also be investigated.
Ref: bottom of page 220 to page 221

The NRC report also stated:

On the basis of information largely derived from histological, chemical, and molecular studies, it is apparent that fluorides have the ability to interfere with the functions of the brain and the body by direct and indirect means. To determine the possible adverse effects of fluoride, additional data from both the experimental and the clinical sciences are needed.

Tabulated data found here -

Health dept. issues fluoridation warning

ELLOWS FALLS -- The Vermont Department of Health is warning parents not to give any fluoridated water to infants under 12 months of age.

The recommendation comes on the heels of a recent statement from the American Dental Association that also asks parents not to mix infant formula with fluoridated water because of the risk it poses to the children.

It is the strongest statement to date from either the ADA or the health department concerning the health risks of the compound that is added to many municipal water supplies in the country to battle tooth decay.

"This warning went out to every dentist and pediatrician in the state," said Steve Arthur, oral health director for the Department of Health. "We now know that when dealing with infants that less is best."

The health department, and the ADA, still strongly endorse the use of fluoride in public water supplies and the groups also encourage people who do not get fluoride from their water to take daily supplements.

But recent research has proved that babies who are getting most of their nourishment from powdered formula take in much more fluoride, per weight, than older children.

The new studies show that high levels of fluoride in infants can cause discoloration of the teeth known as fluorosis.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends breast feeding exclusively for the first six months, the health department said in a press release.

Arthur said prior to the new recommendation both the ADA and the Vermont Department of Health warned that parents should probably be aware of the amount of fluoride given to young children.

Arthur called fluorosis a minor health problem and he said the warning was given out to let parents know about the risk.

"This corrects a contrasting and confusing recommendation," Arthur said. "We are saying that we now have this information and we want to get it out so parents can make the choice."

Water has natural levels of fluoride, and Arthur said that parents should have their water tested if they use well water to mix formula.

The battle over adding fluoride to public water has raged across the state over the past few years.

In 2001, Brattleboro residents voted not to add the chemical to the town's water.

Last year voters in Bellows Falls rejected a proposal that would have stopped the use of fluoride. Bellows Falls adds fluoride to its water.

Burlington also recently decided to continue adding fluoride to the city's water.

Peter Taylor, executive director of the Vermont State Dental Society, said that even with last month's ADA statement and the more recent Vermont Department of Health warning, most dentists in the state still support water fluoridation.

"The ADA said there was a small possibility of fluorosis in infants and it is important that parents know about that," Taylor said. "Community water fluoridation is still good public health policy."

But Michael Connett, an anti-fluoride activist who works for the Fluoride Action Network, said the health department warning is an important wake-up call and should not be taken lightly.

For years, Connett said, both the ADA and the Vermont Health Department have been hesitant to do anything but fully endorse the use of fluoride.

A recent article in the British medical journal, The Lancet, reported that fluoride may also damage a child's developing brain.

And on Oct. 14, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration notified bottled water manufacturers that they can not claim that fluoridated water that is marketed to infants prevents tooth decay.

Adding fluoride to public water forces users to ingest the chemical whether they want it or not, Connett said. He called the practice reckless.

"It took them 60 years to finally acknowledge that fluoride is dangerous for infants," said Connett. "If fluoride is not safe for everybody than it is not safe for anyone. Period."


If the addition of sodium-fluoride to our (Australian) water supplies is so safe and effective, why has it been banned or abandoned in such enlightened European countries as: Norway, Sweden, Austria, Belgium, Holland, Denmark, France, Italy, and West Germany?(1)

In proportion to it's population, Australia is the most heavily fluoridated country in the world; 98% of the world's population do not drink artificially fluoridated water.

Keen to drink this?

A Doctors opinion

When I think of fluoridation, two words come to mind: medical experiment. And the guinea pig is Y-O-U. That's right: Without any solid proof that ingesting fluoride was beneficial for your teeth-and with no safety tests conducted to determine its potential effects on the rest of your body - the government moved forward with the mass medication of the country's water supply.

Think about it: With the exception of fluoride, every other chemical added to tap water is for the purpose of improving the water's safety. Fluoride is the only chemical added for the purpose of medication. And just like all drugs doled out by Big Pharma, this one comes with a litany of potential side effects. The difference? There's no black box warning on your faucet like there is on a bottle of pills.

But there should be.

Did you know that for years fluoride was classified as a toxin? In fact, not too long ago its only approved uses were as an insecticide and a RAT POISON!

And that's just how your body treats it - as a poison.

Plenty of studies have been done over the years - and the results are frightening. Fluoridation has been linked to immune system alteration, musculoskeletal harm, genetic damage, thyroid dysfunction, and even cancer.

Do you think all that's worth preventing cavities?

Before you answer that, I have one more wrench to toss at you. More and more studies are showing that ingesting fluoride has absolutely no bearing on preventing tooth decay. And now the American Dental Association is advising that parents NOT give fluoridated water to babies - BECAUSE IT CAN CAUSE BRAIN DAMAGE!

Heard enough? Well, there's more. A lot more. I'll give you all the bone-chilling details of fluoride's effect on your body, and I'll tell you all about the best ways to avoid exposure to this toxic chemical in my FREE report, The Fluoride Myth Busted.

Contrary to what your dentist might tell you, you don't need fluoride to have healthy teeth. And if your dentist asks you where you heard such nonsense, tell him Dr. William Campbell Douglass II said so.

And just who am I, you may be wondering.

I've long been one of America's most popular mythbusters. I make it my mission to reveal the surprisingly inexpensive and easy road to real health - to the chagrin of pharmaceutical companies and surgeons everywhere.

I've been called "the conscience of modern medicine," and the National Health Federation voted me "Doctor of the Year." But I've also been labeled a "maverick," and several less flattering names, too, by some of the biggest names in government and the health establishment - but hey, that's part of the territory. I've taken more than a few arrows in my time in order to get you the truth - without paying an arm and a leg for Band-aid "solutions" that will only make you sicker and promise to send you to an early grave.

Trust me - I know how confusing it can be to sift through all the baloney you're indundated with by greedy drug companies and mainstream medicine. That's why I'm happy to offer you this free report, The Fluoride Myth Busted.